I just ran the old version of RegCleaner 4.3 and got 32 results errors. Took no corrective action.
Then I ran PT2008 RegCleaner and got 32 results errors. Took no corrective action. NOTE: The 32 errors were the same.
Then I ran PT2009 RegCleaner and got 2 results errors.
Both PT2008 and PT2009 were run at the same "agressive" level (default level 2).
Is PT2009 more "protective?" Have the internals of the RegCleaner changed so much that it doesn't find the same errors as PT2008?
Obviously, the Operating System and the Hardware configuration did not change. I did notice that a lot of the errors were in the "ARPCache" category. Does PT2009 not find these or consider them errors? Or do I have a setting incorrect in PT2009?
I'm just looking for an explanation, no criticism intended.