tullik wrotetullik wrotetullik wrote
That is amazing ... I get zero hits with the ActiveX scan.
If I had that many, I'd do a raw format scan, then delete and backup in groups. For one example, Select-->By frequent column data-->Error description-->whatever ...
That was on my Vista system.
On my XP Pro system, v 1.7.0.414 found nearly 3900 lines in the ActiveX/... scan.
I'm removing them now in groups (with backup, of course). It's taking a half second per line -- unless it gets faster, that's about an hour ...
Added note: It sped up - took 26 minutes to do 3386 lines. I'm going to see if v 1.7.0.413 finds the rest … later: it did, 468 lines.
If you were in debug mode during all this, the 5 minute scan and 1.5 seconds per line is probably not unreasonable.
BTW, registry cleaner doesn't delete files ...
If you decide to try again later, don't do debug mode for such a large operation -- that debug file could be rather large.
I can't believe you're defending this, Tullik. It took 45 minutes for those entries to be deleted one by one (why one by one?) during which time my CPU ran at 100% *continually* even after I killed every unnecessary process on my PC, including Explorer and my desktop skins/wallpapers, and even if it was in debug mode, so what...45 minutes seems perfectly "unreasonable" to me.
If I take the time and energy to complain about what I feel is a ridiculously slow and CPU-consuming reg entry removal process, it would probably be best not to trivialize the complaint. You can tell me not to remove all reg entries at once in debug mode, or tell me not to use the PT 2006 interface with PT 2007, or tell me another way to avoid the problem (such as not running the scan in Aggressive and/or Test Modes) but so what if it's not an unusual side-effect of what I did. It might not be unusual, but that doesn't it make it the right way for it to go.
That said, I want to update now on what happened:
Maybe I said above (I don't feel like re-reading it) that jv16 PT deleted the RDF files. From what you say, it can't. Fine. How about the reg entries associated with those RDFs (if any)?
All I know is when I opened Firefox, I got 3 messages that various RDF files were missing, and the browser skin and customizations I had were gone. I have FF horribly tricked out, with menus compressed and dozens of addons I could no longer access because the Addon Menu kept freezing up after that happened, so that put me in a very bad spot. I actually had to use IE7 to post here last night, and I hate IE.
System Restore can't bring the missing FF stuff back (as I wrote last night, I've tried that in the past without luck) so I didn't even bother with that.
Fortunately (very fortunately, or I would be too mad for words right now) I keep a partial copy of Disk C:\ on Disk D:\ these days, so it was a trivial matter for me to uninstall Disk C:\'s copy of Firefox, delete the directory for it, copy Disk D:\'s copy of FF to Disk C:\ and proceed from there. My backup copy was up to date with my skins, bookmarks, and customizations intact, so luckily that story had a happy ending.
Is there something seriously wrong with jv16 PT v.413?
Not only did it find 4,092 reg entries for removal the first time I ran it last night, but after that scan finally stopped I ran another one in Aggressive Mode just for kicks (feeling like a real daredevil last night I guess) and it found another 5,000-something "unnecessary" entries.
Nearly 10,000 unneeded entries in one night? How could that be when I'm a religious user of jv16 PT 2006 and earlier versions of 2007's reg cleaning tools?
It seemed my PC was perfectly clean in the first place, so why all this "dead wood" now? What is it trying to remove...the entire Registry?
As to your instructions to create the debug file, they didn't work. Renaming the .txt file to a .dat file, then cutting and pasting that into the jv16PT.exe directory, did *not* create a .txt file on my Desktop after I finished running jv16 PT in debug mode. (No text file in the Directory, either.) It's too bad. That's one debug file I would have loved for the dev to see.