Error kernell32.dll

tullik

Confirmed -- v 1.7.0.411 works with W98SE 4.10.2222A. I tried more than a dozen tools and subtools - no problems occurred and all features tried worked as expected.

fouchtra

hi,

the new version 1.7.0.413 works with W98SE

ckag

Alas, no joy for me and my Win98SE system.

I had originally tried 413 when it first came out but it didn't work. Then tonite I saw that many of you Win98SE users were reporting that it was okay so I tried 413 again.

I tried installing 413 both as an upgrade over the existing 394 and as a clean install. In both cases, the installation seemed to go okay but when I try to actually load jv16 PowerTools, nothing happens.

tullik

@ ckag,

Your report now shows in the "important issues" list: http://www.macecraft.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=11485#11485

tullik

@ ckag,

FYI -- I just brought up PT2007 (413), RSPro (414), and RS (414) simultaneously on W98SE 4.10.2222 -- no problems.

Is your W98SE the same version? I don't know if that would make a difference ...

tullik

tullik wrote
@ ckag,

FYI -- I just brought up PT2007 (413), RSPro (414), and RS (414) simultaneously on W98SE 4.10.2222 -- no problems.

Is your W98SE the same version? I don't know if that would make a difference ...

I guess not - seems that number just means Windows 98 Second Edition.

Perhaps the explorer.exe version is more relevant -- it is v 4.72.3110.1 on my son's W98SE PC.

ckag

>> Is your W98SE the same version? I don't know if that would make a difference ... <<

Yes, my version is 4.10.22222B. The only difference is the "B", if that makes a difference. This is per System Information. My Explorer.exe file is the same version as you cited.

ckag

As an afterthought, I thought I'd add a little more detail.

Since v413 seemed to work for others and you, I tried a little brute force. I disabled everyting in MSCONFIG | Startup except for System Tray and Scanreg. I also went thru the registry and removed every reference to "jv16". I also disabled my network connection. Still no joy.

If I'm the only one still complaining about Win98SE, please don't fret on my account. I'm getting very close to wiping out Win98SE from that machine and installing XP on it. As you said earlier, fewer and fewer programs support Win98SE and I will soon need to move to XP on that machine if I want to keep it running.

tullik

wikipedia wrote
... Windows 98 Second Edition is designated by the internal version number 4.10.2222A, or 4.10.2222B if it has been updated with the Security CD from Microsoft. ...

Mine is 4.10.2222A. Maybe that is what is making the difference ... ?

ckag

>> Mine is 4.10.2222A. Maybe that is what is making the difference ... ? <<

I wouldn't have a clue. All I can say is that my Win98SE has all the Windows Update Critical Updates applied plus a few of the recommended optional ones. It does not have .NET Framework installed. I tried installing .NET Framework v1.1 a couple of times in the past and it failed miserably so I never bothered again.

tullik

@ any W98SE v 4.10.2222B user,

Is Macecraft v 1.7.0.413 or v.1.7.0.414 working for you?

/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

@ any W98SE v 4.10.2222A user,

Is Macecraft v 1.7.0.413 or v.1.7.0.414 not working for you?

/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Note: DOS ver command doesn't show the A or B.

To see the A or B, you have to run some other system info program (can't remember its name at the moment : ).

ckag

>> To see the A or B, you have to run some other system info program (can't remember its name at the moment ). <<

That would be System Informatin. You get there via Start | Accessories | System Tools | System Information.

gobbledog

ckag wrote
As an afterthought, I thought I'd add a little more detail.

Since v413 seemed to work for others and you, I tried a little brute force. I disabled everyting in MSCONFIG | Startup except for System Tray and Scanreg. I also went thru the registry and removed every reference to "jv16". I also disabled my network connection. Still no joy.

If I'm the only one still complaining about Win98SE, please don't fret on my account. I'm getting very close to wiping out Win98SE from that machine and installing XP on it. As you said earlier, fewer and fewer programs support Win98SE and I will soon need to move to XP on that machine if I want to keep it running.

I am having the same no joy problem. I just heard last week that 70 million computer users world wide are still using WIN98, WIN98SE, or Millenium.

Just from a business point of view, it would seem to make the problem relevant.

jv16

We are working on making our products to work again with Windows 98 as we speak. I'm hoping the next released version again works under Windows 98 but as the problem is not fixed yet I cannot promise that.

gobbledog

jv16 wrote
We are working on making our products to work again with Windows 98 as we speak. I'm hoping the next released version again works under Windows 98 but as the problem is not fixed yet I cannot promise that.

I very much appreciate your work on this thorny problem. Why it works on one system and not another is very odd. Especially when running processes are terminated. My feeling is that it has something to do with the vista parameters. A strange intermittant code conflict, since previous to vista all 98 stuff was running fine. Good luck to you and your team JV.

PS my ex played a series of Jazz concerts in Helsinki in late August - early September. She has been there several times and loves it. Her first name is Marilyn - last is same as mine.

ckag

Still no joy with the new v1.7.0.420...

I installed it over the existing 394 and 420 still doesn't load.

Just fyi.

jv16

ckag wrote
Still no joy with the new v1.7.0.420...

I installed it over the existing 394 and 420 still doesn't load.

Thanks for the confirmation, I wasn't expecting it to work yet either. Our focus with this release was to fix some annoying bugs of the program, as well as improve the 64 bit Vista compatibility.

I'm currently out of the office for the rest of this month (I'm staying in Grenada, West Indies), I have a remote connection to my work files but I can't work with the Win9x compatibility from here, and the rest of our workers are already working on PT 2008. So, the fix for this is still on its way.

ckag

>> I'm staying in Grenada, West Indies <<

I hope it's for pleasure! Have a great holidays!

jv16

Great news: the Win9x problem with our products is now solved and tested to work in our test enviroment.

The problem was relating to an incompatibility between different Windows version where all the new versions allowed a certaion piece of code to run without any problems but Win9x didn't.

The fixed version of PT will be released within one week.

Thank you all for your input and patience!

ckag

Great!.. I'll go after v4.22 in just a bit and get back to you.

« Previous Page Next Page »